Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    1 members (jaystormrage), 108 guests, and 42 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    jkeller, Alex Hoxdson, JPH, Alex011, Scotmicky12
    11,444 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 2 of 2 1 2
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Posts: 2,498
    D
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    D
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Posts: 2,498
    Dbat, it's sad, but lots of people send their kids to private schools expressly to keep them away from kids who have (ahem) "issues." Private schools are under considerable pressure from those parents to keep out kids who are regarded as troublesome, different, what have you--they typically have little incentive to help or serve those kids.

    Often kids who have unusual needs really will do better in a public school, where at least they have their civil rights to fall back on.

    DeeDee

    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Likes: 1
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Likes: 1
    Originally Posted by DeeDee in Quota System thread
    ...I hope you don't believe that most of us here agree with all the racist and/or pseudoscientific and/or politically regressive and/or exclusionary opinions voiced above.

    Originally Posted by DeeDee
    ...it's sad, but lots of people send their kids to private schools expressly to keep them away from kids who have (ahem) "issues." Private schools are under considerable pressure from those parents to keep out kids who are regarded as troublesome, different, what have you--they typically have little incentive to help or serve those kids.

    Often kids who have unusual needs really will do better in a public school, where at least they have their civil rights to fall back on.

    DeeDee

    Wow! And you accused me of being making regressive, biased claims based on pseudoscience! Can you please show me some peer-reviewed studies demonstrating that private schools trample the civil rights of their students? And that so many of us private school parents are putting considerable pressure on our kids' schools to keep out kids who are "troublesome, different, [or] what have you?" Or are you just allowed to make unsupported claims because you believe them?

    I've looked at a lot of schools for my kids over the years (30+), and the only one I encountered that expressly didn't want kids with disabilities was a "high-performing" public school. They were honest with me: "our test scores are high because we don't admit kids with disabilities. They can get services at the other schools in the district."

    The only point I'm trying to make here is that your generalization doesn't hold water. I expect that the knife cuts both ways on this question.

    Sheesh!


    Joined: Apr 2010
    Posts: 2,498
    D
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    D
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Posts: 2,498
    Originally Posted by Val
    Can you please show me some peer-reviewed studies demonstrating that private schools trample the civil rights of their students? And that so many of us private school parents are putting considerable pressure on our kids' schools to keep out kids who are "troublesome, different, [or] what have you?"

    The legal protections I am referring to (the "free appropriate public education" guaranteed by IDEA) do not apply to private schools. These schools are not required to make the same accommodations for people with disabilities as public schools are. These schools have a choice, and many of them choose not to offer services and supports such as aides, PT, OT, speech, as well as many subtler forms of accommodation. This is not a matter of "trampling" on anything; it is a matter of what rules apply to those schools, and the choices their administrators make. This is not necessarily an instance of "meanness"; it's undoubtedly a decision about resources and clientele and a host of different variables. Running any school is complicated.

    Originally Posted by Val
    Or are you just allowed to make unsupported claims because you believe them?

    Sorry I offended you; obviously, I am not talking about all private school parents or all private schools everywhere.

    However, in my extensive school-shopping in my region and in my wide-ranging correspondence with other people who face the same issues in educating their 2E/AS kids that I face with mine, this is noted as a frequently occurring situation. Prestigious private schools routinely decline to admit kids like mine, or they expel them when the going gets rough. (I can add that therapeutic private schools often don't know what to do with the 2E, either, leaving few options.)

    DeeDee




    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Likes: 1
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Likes: 1
    If that's what you meant, that's what you should have said, instead of making sweeping generalizations. For example, you said "civil rights," not "IDEA legal protections that apply in the public schools." These are very different things.

    Last edited by Val; 08/14/12 09:34 AM.
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Posts: 2,498
    D
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    D
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Posts: 2,498
    One might ask for clarification before becoming inflammatory. Just a thought.

    DeeDee

    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Likes: 1
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Likes: 1
    Respectfully, you did precisely what you accused me of doing (twice now), which I am merely exposing. Calling me a regressive pseudoscientific racist when I wasn't even bringing up race or thinking in those terms was way more inflammatory than anything I've written in this thread and was highly offensive. But it's okay when you don't like what other people say, right?

    I see that this is a tactic that people use to distract people from the real point at hand. It's common in politics and elsewhere, and I'm sorry to see it here.

    I have no problem with contentious statements when supported. I just don't like this tactic of accusing others of doing what you're doing.

    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 1,898
    C
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    C
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 1,898
    Originally Posted by Val
    Calling me a regressive pseudoscientific racist
    Nobody called you, or anybody else, that, Val, either on this thread or on the other. Please don't put words into people's mouths (fingers) and then attack them; it isn't either fair or helpful.


    Email: my username, followed by 2, at google's mail
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Likes: 1
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Likes: 1
    Originally Posted by ColinsMum
    Originally Posted by Val
    Calling me a regressive pseudoscientific racist
    Nobody called you, or anybody else, that, Val, either on this thread or on the other. Please don't put words into people's mouths (fingers) and then attack them; it isn't either fair or helpful.

    It sure sounded that way in the quote I included above that was posted here. But we're derailing this thread now.

    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Originally Posted by Val
    Originally Posted by ColinsMum
    Originally Posted by Val
    Calling me a regressive pseudoscientific racist
    Nobody called you, or anybody else, that, Val, either on this thread or on the other. Please don't put words into people's mouths (fingers) and then attack them; it isn't either fair or helpful.

    It sure sounded that way in the quote I included above that was posted here. But we're derailing this thread now.

    Food Fight!

    Page 2 of 2 1 2

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    psat questions and some griping :)
    by SaturnFan - 05/22/24 08:50 AM
    2e & long MAP testing
    by aeh - 05/16/24 04:30 PM
    Classroom support for advanced reader
    by Xtydell - 05/15/24 02:28 PM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by mithawk - 05/13/24 06:50 PM
    For those interested in science...
    by indigo - 05/11/24 05:00 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5