Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 262 guests, and 31 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Gingtto, SusanRoth
    11,429 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 1 of 2 1 2
    #114298 10/20/11 08:25 AM
    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posts: 2,640
    Likes: 1
    B
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posts: 2,640
    Likes: 1
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203752604576641133332697322.html
    As Brain Changes, So Can IQ
    Study Finds Teens' Intellects May Be More Malleable Than Previously Thought
    By ROBERT LEE HOTZ
    Wall Street Journal
    OCTOBER 20, 2011

    A teenager's IQ can rise or fall as many as 20 points in just a few years, a brain-scanning team found in a study published Wednesday that suggests a young person's intelligence measure isn't as fixed as once thought.

    The researchers also found that shifts in IQ scores corresponded to small physical changes in brain areas related to intellectual skills, though they weren't able to show a clear cause and effect.

    "If the finding is true, it could signal environmental factors that are changing the brain and intelligence over a relatively short period," said psychologist Robert Plomin at Kings College in London, who studies the genetics of intelligence and wasn't involved in the research. "That is quite astounding."

    Long at the center of debates over how intelligence can be measured, an IQ score�the initials stand for "intelligence quotient"�typically gauges mental capacity through a battery of standardized tests of language skill, spatial ability, arithmetic, memory and reasoning. A score of 100 is considered average. Barring injury, that intellectual capacity remains constant throughout life, most experts believe.

    But the new findings by researchers at University College London, reported online in Nature, suggest that IQ, often used to predict school performance and job prospects, may be more malleable than previously believed�and more susceptible to outside influences, such as tutoring or neglect.

    "A change in 20 points is a huge difference," said the team's senior researcher, Cathy Price, at the university's Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging. Indeed, it can mean the difference between being rated average and being labeled gifted�or, conversely, being categorized as substandard.

    Researchers found that dramatic changes in verbal IQ corresponded to changes in an area of the brain associated with speech, whereas nonverbal IQ changes were related to an area involved in hand movements.

    To better understand intelligence, Dr. Price and her colleagues studied 33 healthy British teenagers whose IQ scores initially ranged from 80 to 140. They tested the volunteers on standardized intelligence exams in 2004 and again in 2008, to encompass the peak years of their adolescence, while monitoring subtle changes in brain structure using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    By analyzing verbal and nonverbal IQ performance separately, the researchers discovered that these fundamental facets of intelligence could change markedly, even in cases when an overall composite IQ score remained relatively constant.

    "One fifth of them jumped one way or the other," Dr. Price said. One teenager's verbal IQ score rose to 138 at age 17 from 120 at age 13, while her nonverbal IQ dropped to a below-average score of85 from 103. Another's verbal IQ soared to 127 from 104 in four years, while his nonverbal performance stayed the same.


    A teenager's IQ can rise or fall up to 20 points in just a few years, in a finding that pinpoints unexpected variations in a measure of intelligence often used to predict school performance and job prospects. Robert Lee Hotz explains on The News Hub.

    The rise or fall in verbal IQ scores appeared to be connected to changes in an area of the brain associated with speech, whereas shifts in nonverbal IQ related to an area involved in motor control and hand movements.

    In recent years, scientists have determined that experience can readily alter the brain, as networks of neural synapses bloom in response to activity or wither with disuse. Expert musicians, circus jugglers and London cab drivers studying maps�even Colombian guerillas learning to read�have all shown brain changes linked to practice, several brain imaging studies have reported. But until now, researchers had considered general intelligence too basic to be affected by such relatively small neural adjustments. Dr. Price and her colleagues don't know what caused the changes in both the brain and the scores they documented, but speculated they could be a result of learning experiences.

    Several brain specialists said the changes could just as plausibly reflect the pace of normal growth, and shifts in scores could be due to inconsistent test performance.

    The varying IQ scores could also indicate the test itself is flawed. "It could be a real index of how intelligence varies or it could suggest our measures of intelligence are so variable," said neuroimaging pioneer B.J. Casey at Cornell University's Weill Medical College, who wasn't involved in the study.

    <end of excerpt>

    Here is the abstract, from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature10514.html :

    Verbal and non-verbal intelligence changes in the teenage brain

    Sue Ramsden, Fiona M. Richardson, Goulven Josse, Michael S. C. Thomas, Caroline Ellis, Clare Shakeshaft, Mohamed L. Seghier & Cathy J. Price
    Nature (2011) doi:10.1038/nature10514
    Received 17 May 2011 Accepted 26 August 2011 Published online 19 October 2011
    ntelligence quotient (IQ) is a standardized measure of human intellectual capacity that takes into account a wide range of cognitive skills1. IQ is generally considered to be stable across the lifespan, with scores at one time point used to predict educational achievement and employment prospects in later years1. Neuroimaging allows us to test whether unexpected longitudinal fluctuations in measured IQ are related to brain development. Here we show that verbal and non-verbal IQ can rise or fall in the teenage years, with these changes in performance validated by their close correlation with changes in local brain structure. A combination of structural and functional imaging showed that verbal IQ changed with grey matter in a region that was activated by speech, whereas non-verbal IQ changed with grey matter in a region that was activated by finger movements. By using longitudinal assessments of the same individuals, we obviated the many sources of variation in brain structure that confound cross-sectional studies. This allowed us to dissociate neural markers for the two types of IQ and to show that general verbal and non-verbal abilities are closely linked to the sensorimotor skills involved in learning. More generally, our results emphasize the possibility that an individual�s intellectual capacity relative to their peers can decrease or increase in the teenage years. This would be encouraging to those whose intellectual potential may improve, and would be a warning that early achievers may not maintain their potential.


    "To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle." - George Orwell
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 1,777
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 1,777
    networks of neural synapses bloom in response to activity or wither with disuse

    True Dat.

    It's called adaptability. We have it.


    Youth lives by personality, age lives by calculation. -- Aristotle on a calendar
    Joined: Dec 2010
    Posts: 1,040
    A
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Dec 2010
    Posts: 1,040
    Ye one more reason to ensure that kids get the challenge they need all through childhood and adolescence. Waiting for college is a bad idea.

    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 1,777
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 1,777
    I have often read in these forums that little children go go go with one skill, then it regresses a little while they turn their attention to another, not that they lose everything they've gained. �My grandmother said children just learn like that. �If they know something, then later they don't know it, it's not that they're faking it or have forgotten they have just put it on the back burner. �It's still in there it will come back around. Maybe certain stages take different strengths. �


    Youth lives by personality, age lives by calculation. -- Aristotle on a calendar
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 1,299
    I
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    I
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 1,299
    I heard this story on NPR and this part highlighted why we're here:
    "There are lots of factors that may explain changes in IQ. Though this study did not attempt to nail them down, lots of prior research has found that educational environment is key. Some researchers have found that rigorous academic curricula lead to improved IQ scores."

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/201...study-that-finds-big-jumps-dips-in-teens

    Joined: Jan 2008
    Posts: 1,690
    W
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    W
    Joined: Jan 2008
    Posts: 1,690
    Although DD is only just 7, I have noticed significant changes in her processing speed, which I correlate to her piano. As she gets into more complex pieces and reading the music, I see exponential changes in the speed that she does her math also. She has even commented that she notices her brain figuring things out now.

    She is obviously not a teenager, but just commenting that the finger movements are affecting her non-verbal area at this age.

    Ren

    Joined: Jun 2008
    Posts: 1,897
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jun 2008
    Posts: 1,897
    Great article on the teen brain in Nat'l Geo recently -- along these lines (how much does the brain change, and in what ways?)

    Joined: Jan 2008
    Posts: 1,690
    W
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    W
    Joined: Jan 2008
    Posts: 1,690
    It would be really interesting if Davidson had everyone who became DYS before age 7, did another test at age 12 and then 18 and also noted if they were atheletically active, musically active etc.


    Joined: May 2008
    Posts: 109
    R
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    R
    Joined: May 2008
    Posts: 109
    I wonder for those who had scores to drop, how were subsequent scores affected by anxiety? It also makes sense for others, that previous exposure to types of questions could cause scores to go up. (It has been over 30 years since I took a SB, yet I can still remember some of the questions.) Too many variables for me to put much weight into this one.

    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 332
    B
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 332
    In middle school, we note that puberty can be a major disruption to cognitive processes. Girls, in particular, often take a dive in terms of academic achievement that lasts for several months.

    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 982
    L
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    L
    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 982
    Before my 13 year old son entered puberty and started getting migraines and scoliosis, I think he learned twice as fast as most kids. These issues, along with normal puberty changes, definitely caused some disruption to cognitive processes but he is able to work around it. When he is not distracted by pain he still learns very quickly which is why he is still able to learn lines, lyrics and dances in musical theater in time to do the shows.

    I was surprised how quickly he learned guitar chords last night with his new Rocksmith that plugs into his electric guitar. He also does well in piano when he doesn't have a headache or back pain.

    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Originally Posted by master of none
    Does this mean that if I shield my child from higher academics in high school, I might make them more normal in IQ and better able to fit in with society?

    To be clear, it's not my intention or plan, just thinking about all the kids who have no challenge throughout their developing years and if society might have a stake in making them more normal, closing those achievement gaps.

    I don't the result of that particular naturalist experiment is "more normal", simply because when completing schoolwork is like sandblasting a soup cracker, "normal" doesn't quite seem like the logical outcome.

    Joined: Mar 2011
    Posts: 358
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Mar 2011
    Posts: 358
    I am meeting with the a Professor from local University specialization in School Psychology and Assessment tomorrow. I am for sure going to get her take on this.
    The school has been wanting to accelerate my DS in 3rd grade since starting in 1st. He is now 2+ grades up in math and reading. We have been in the camp of no acceleration as a hole but where needed. The professor lead us in this decision.

    Should studies like this have weight in the balancing act.
    It would be nice if the study included 3000 individuals.

    Page 1 of 2 1 2

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 05/03/24 07:21 PM
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by brilliantcp - 05/02/24 05:17 PM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by Wren - 04/29/24 03:43 AM
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5