I'm wondering if more time spent on item design could fix the artificial attenuation of gifted kids' picture concepts scores.
When I make analogies or matrices or number series I try to eliminate ambiguity, but official test developers have other constraints (like biases) and finite time.
It would be helpful if the "what would typical learners say" was viewed as standard administration, because it's not a hint or change in difficulty.
Your knowledge on the comprehension subtest is interesting.
Thank you for answering my questions.
These next three things are unrelated:
If I were to make a GAI-type index it would have information, vocabulary, similarities, matrix reasoning, figure weights, picture concepts, and visual puzzles.
I wonder why visual puzzles is not in the GAI, EGAI, or FSIQ like block design.
I might get an opportunity to take the WISC-V soon and want to ask some questions on which subtests are spoiled or inflated and of the unspoiled ones which ones would be relevant for me to take.
