So all of the subtests, with the exception of the three timed tasks, were in the Very Superior range.
With those VCI scores, extended norms most certainly should have been considered for that index. Although PRI still looks slightly lower than VCI, it does look like this is due mainly to block design, so not necessarily as significant a difference.
I would say the naked scores support a genuine difference between speeded and untimed tasks, with all other skills banging up against the top of the norms. Of course, it doesn't explain the etiology of the difference.
Did the examiner give you any indication as to his/her interpretive direction? This is difficult to interpret meaningfully without clinical observations or additional data about academic, behavioral, life function, etc. performance.
Does your child appear to work slowly IRL? Have difficulty with fine motor tasks? Had a recent vision check? Appear distractible or unfocused?
If you don't have IRL concerns about processing speed, this may not be a problem. More like a working style, accompanying a reflective task approach.
Last edited by aeh; 09/29/14 03:20 PM.
