Our state mandates ID but no services. They're working on that.
And, personally, I'd say mandating services but without funding or requiring follow-through is essentially the same thing as not mandating services, which is why I don't include PA in my list of "states that require specific educational provisions." If provisions are required by the law but not provided, and if there's no fallout from that dereliction of duty, then provisions are not actually required IRL. If that makes any sense...?
PA is a state that's supposed to be better than most, too. I've not heard the same of FL, which is why I'm skeptical.
Still, take me with a grain of salt on this!
