It's hereditary, but not in a single gene, it's systematic? Um, I'm going to have to re-read all that, but not now. I guess I get that you're saying popular articles should quit telling the public that it's in the genes because that will send scientists research off in the wrong direction. I guess like they said in the other thread you're saying it's just not right to study on the side of nature in a group that's all had the same nurture. What's that stuff they were talking about that turns the genes on to activate the traits, epigenetics?
