He took the test in 1996, when he was in his 30s.
I find this story to be incredibly depressing. The idea that it's okay to discriminate against someone because he's smart/got a high score on a test is obscene. Isn't that what you want?
I don't even know how the court could justify it rationale that the same standards were applied to everyone who took the test.
What if a standard for the job had been "Must be a man"? The same standard would have been applied to everyone in that case too.
Last edited by Val; 01/01/12 04:29 PM. Reason: [SPAM]
