Does this mean that if I shield my child from higher academics in high school, I might make them more normal in IQ and better able to fit in with society?
To be clear, it's not my intention or plan, just thinking about all the kids who have no challenge throughout their developing years and if society might have a stake in making them more normal, closing those achievement gaps.
I don't the result of that particular naturalist experiment is "more normal", simply because when completing schoolwork is like sandblasting a soup cracker, "normal" doesn't quite seem like the logical outcome.
