Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 216 guests, and 18 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Word_Nerd93, jenjunpr, calicocat, Heidi_Hunter, Dilore
    11,421 Registered Users
    April
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28 29 30
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 2 of 2 1 2
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,297
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,297
    Originally Posted by Nautigal
    [quote]This is why my brother (who is now a "rocket scientist"--aerospace engineering for the past 25 years) had to repeat calculus in high school. He didn't show his work on the problems (because he did them in his head and didn't have any work to show), and even though he always had the answers right, failed the class anyway. He refused to dumb it down to show work that he didn't need to do to get the answers, and failed. The teacher knew perfectly well that he knew more than the teacher did...

    If the teacher knew that your brother knew more than s/he did, why did s/he fail him? Is the purpose of the class to learn calculus or to write stuff down the way teacher likes?

    Richard Feynman talked about this idea in his essay The Making of a Scientist. Some older kids were doing 2x +7 = 15 and he said "X is 4" and they said "You did it by arithmetic. You have to do it by algebra." The implication was that he didn't understand algebra.

    So he taught himself algebra and argued that the point is to figure out what x is, not to follow a set of rules blindly. He also argued that the rules represented a way to get the answer if you don't understand what you're trying to do. Then he gave examples of people who could "do" calculus --- by using the rules --- but didn't truly understand it.


    Food for thought.

    Val


    Joined: Jun 2008
    Posts: 1,840
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jun 2008
    Posts: 1,840
    I like Feynman a lot. His lectures on physics are treasures.

    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,297
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,297
    Originally Posted by Austin
    I like Feynman a lot. His lectures on physics are treasures.

    Like pretty much everything else he wrote. I was reading his description of the Challenger investigation and was struck by how wonderful he was. My favorite part was when he used ice water to test the O-rings. Brilliant!

    Val

    Joined: Feb 2009
    Posts: 921
    J
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    J
    Joined: Feb 2009
    Posts: 921
    Originally Posted by master of none
    I was a math/biology double major until a calculus class that reqired using the method being taught I tried, but sometimes I'd forget the formula, and derive it- or another applicable one - so even though the answer was right, the work I showed was "all wrong".

    Wow, are you sure you aren't me? Calculus is what changed my Math/Biology major too my freshman year in college... not because I didn't understand it, or didn't get the answers correct, but because I was unable to show the "correct" work. For me, it was work on the computer, in a specific program. I could use paper and formulas all day long, but I could not translate it to the programs being used on the computer. And not to show my age too much, but I took a real typing class on a type writer when I was in high school, so computers weren't quite what they are today (or at least we weren't using them as we do today).

    Joined: Nov 2008
    Posts: 309
    P
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Nov 2008
    Posts: 309
    We've done a ffew things ever since K:

    1) communicate with the teachers, and encourage DS to communicate with the teachers himself. Sometimes I feel that it si more effective coming from the kid than from the parents because some teachers just brush off the parents as being pushy.

    2) tell DS that it is important to do the boring stuff right so that teachers believe him when he asks for more challenging stuff.

    3) tell DS that not everything is interesting. Most of the time the work itself is not particularly interesting but it gets him to where he wants to be. Basically "we do what we have to do in order to do what we want to do". This is the kind of patience we need to train ourselves to have.

    4) occasionally when DS is really bothered and can't seem to get over it, I'd do the work for him.

    It works to a certain extent.

    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 73
    B
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 73
    There is an interesting article in the 2e newsletter this week about how personality, level of giftedness, and gender can affect classroom behavior. I've never paid a huge amount of attention to Myers-Briggs testing, but according to Ruf, an FP (feeling perceiver) is more apt to refuse to do the work that is beneath him/her.

    Both my sons absolutely fit these descriptions of kids who won't do the work to jump through hoops, or to please the teacher, or to get it over with, or whatever. If it's a "stupid" assignment, it is offensive to them personally.

    It sounds like a few of us adults may have made similar choices as students, regardless of whether the choice "got us what we wanted" which is what popular child psychology seems to tell us is motivating our children. (Pet peeve here - I have heard that my kids "must not care, don't want to work hard", etc a few too many times. mad No one has ever said, "I'm so sorry that I offended your sensitive 7 yr old!" laugh


    http://www.educationaloptions.com/resources/resources_rufs_tips.php



    Benny
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 7
    L
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    L
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 7
    Oh dear, Lauren. Sounds like a sadly familiar tale. I hope the new school goes well, but I'd be seriously planning to start homeschooling before the year is out, lest your little one's love of learning be crushed by these "professionals" who seem completely unable to think outside the box. Why should these poor kids be forced to sit and do baby work all day just so they can learn how to be bored later in life? As an adult, if you had to sit through unproductive meetings all day where everything that was covered was stuff you'd known for years, you'd go ballistic eventually.

    I'd better be careful, or I could go on a (bigger) rant myself, lol.


    Page 2 of 2 1 2

    Moderated by  M-Moderator, Mark D. 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Jo Boaler and Gifted Students
    by thx1138 - 04/12/24 02:37 PM
    For those interested in astronomy, eclipses...
    by indigo - 04/08/24 12:40 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5