Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about the Davidson Academy’s online campus for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute
  • DITD FaceBook   DITD Twitter   DITD YouTube
    The Davidson Institute is on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube!

    How gifted-friendly is
    your state?

    Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update

    Who's Online
    0 registered (), 0 Guests and 388 Spiders online.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    TEACHERMOM3.14, Drusillain, chinnny, Fast Words, LC001
    11242 Registered Users
    December
    Su M Tu W Th F Sa
    1 2 3
    4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17
    18 19 20 21 22 23 24
    25 26 27 28 29 30 31
    Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
    Topic Options
    #249854 - 07/07/22 01:55 PM Re: Elitism [Re: indigo]
    spaghetti Offline
    Member

    Registered: 05/05/15
    Posts: 474
    Indigo-- thanks for your response. I don't accept your characterization of my statements or the choices you have given me as clarification. I meant what I said or would not have posted. It's just a viewpoint that happens to have data and policy behind it. That's all.



    Top
    #249855 - 07/07/22 04:34 PM Re: Elitism [Re: spaghetti]
    indigo Offline
    Member

    Registered: 04/27/13
    Posts: 4957
    Originally Posted By: spaghetti
    characterization of my statements
    "allegation/accusation" as you appear to be mentioning violations of the law: https://www.findlaw.com/civilrights/discrimination/race-discrimination-in-education.html

    Originally Posted By: spaghetti
    It's just a viewpoint that happens to have data and policy behind it.
    Please feel free to share the data and policy which inform your view that "in some places they are not recognizing minorities, children from impoverished backgrounds, etc."

    Top
    #249858 - 07/08/22 04:18 AM Re: Elitism [Re: indigo]
    spaghetti Offline
    Member

    Registered: 05/05/15
    Posts: 474

    My point in responding to you was to make clear that I do not intend to change my post.

    Top
    #249859 - 07/08/22 04:51 AM Re: Elitism [Re: spaghetti]
    indigo Offline
    Member

    Registered: 04/27/13
    Posts: 4957
    Originally Posted By: spaghetti
    My point in responding to you was to make clear that I do not intend to change my post.
    I did not ask you to change your post. I asked whether you could back up what you said, by providing even one place where what you claim, is occurring. I also asked if you could clarify your meaning.

    After you mentioned data and policy in a subsequent post, I asked if you could point to data and/or policy which informs your view.

    If unable or unwilling to provide any substantiating facts or source, your statements may be considered "unfounded."

    Top
    #249862 - 07/09/22 04:41 AM Re: Elitism [Re: indigo]
    philly103 Offline
    Member

    Registered: 03/02/17
    Posts: 95
    Originally Posted By: indigo
    Originally Posted By: spaghetti
    characterization of my statements
    "allegation/accusation" as you appear to be mentioning violations of the law: https://www.findlaw.com/civilrights/discrimination/race-discrimination-in-education.html

    Originally Posted By: spaghetti
    It's just a viewpoint that happens to have data and policy behind it.
    Please feel free to share the data and policy which inform your view that "in some places they are not recognizing minorities, children from impoverished backgrounds, etc."


    I don't understand what you're disagreeing with. For a community focused on gifted education and gifted kids at the upper end of that scale, this should be something that we've all read about many times over.

    Someone might disagree with the position papers out there but it makes no sense to argue from a position of "Show me something that supports your claim."

    https://www.edpost.com/stories/gifted-bl...d-for-all-of-us
    In this link, they briefly explain how those kids are being ignored. In districts that use a universal screening approach, they find more Black, Hispanic and low income students. In areas that don't use universal screening to find gifted kids, it's perfectly reasonable to state that they are ignoring such students - particularly the low income ones.

    There are plenty of papers out there about how, in districts that rely on teacher referral to gifted programs, black students are not referred to gifted programs with the same frequency as their white or Asian counterparts when they are paired with non-black instructors. That is an example of being ignored. You can find plenty of links covering this but we should all already be familiar with the broad strokes.

    We can probably shrink the conversation to the concept of "educational malnourishment". Essentially, too many gifted programs identify students based on achievement rather than on giftedness. They admit to their programs around the 2nd or 3rd grade after discrepancies in educational opportunities have calcified certain achievement differences.

    This places students from lower education backgrounds at a disadvantage for identification, either via teacher referral or achievement tests. Hence why universal screening done earlier in the student's academic life id's more black, Hispanic and lower income students -- it seeks to id the students before the school system has placed them behind better resourced students.

    But that's not really the point of my post. The point of my post is that this is easily found information for anyone who bothers to look. You can argue about if you agree with the widely claimed causes for those kids being ignored but it doesn't make sense in this day and age to pretend that the claim of students being ignored is so unusual that someone has to source it before it can be addressed seriously.

    Frankly, it's dismissive.

    https://www.education.purdue.edu/geri/new-publications/gifted-education-in-the-united-states/
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/educ...labeled-gifted/
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/educ...labeled-gifted/
    https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files...f%20Poverty.pdf
    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ898573.pdf
    https://edublog.scholastic.com/post/equi...ented-education

    Anyway, there are some links that also address this subject. It's hardly exhaustive but it's an okay place to start.

    Top
    #249864 - 07/10/22 01:08 PM Re: Elitism [Re: philly103]
    indigo Offline
    Member

    Registered: 04/27/13
    Posts: 4957
    Hello philly, how interesting of you to share what informs YOUR viewpoint, as though this must also be what has informed spaghetti's viewpoint.

    In the list of links which you provided, I find nothing newer than 5 years old, therefore I do question the current tense of spaghetti's statement that "in some places they are not recognizing minorities, children from impoverished backgrounds, etc."

    Although some may disagree, it makes sense to seek clarification, facts, data, policy, and source.

    Top
    #249871 - 07/11/22 12:05 PM Re: Elitism [Re: Vansh]
    spaghetti Offline
    Member

    Registered: 05/05/15
    Posts: 474
    Thank you Philly. Good sources.

    Top
    #249878 - 07/17/22 01:13 PM Re: Elitism [Re: indigo]
    philly103 Offline
    Member

    Registered: 03/02/17
    Posts: 95
    Originally Posted By: indigo
    Hello philly, how interesting of you to share what informs YOUR viewpoint, as though this must also be what has informed spaghetti's viewpoint.

    In the list of links which you provided, I find nothing newer than 5 years old, therefore I do question the current tense of spaghetti's statement that "in some places they are not recognizing minorities, children from impoverished backgrounds, etc."

    Although some may disagree, it makes sense to seek clarification, facts, data, policy, and source.


    It makes sense to seek clarification, etc. when we're talking about things that are rarely discussed or generally unknown, especially when it's an uninformed audience. But this isn't such a community. At the minimum, based on the frequency of your posting, you certainly don't post like you're an uninformed member of the community.

    So, you can understand my surprise when you start demanding proof for something that is heavily discussed in the gifted education space. You certainly have to come across it many, many times prior to this thread. If you don't agree with it then just say that instead of asking posters to jump through empty hoops.

    And it's not about what informs my perspective or spaghetti's, it's the information repeatedly discussed and shared by the people who research and engage this field. Similarly, the 5 years don't matter. If you have more recent facts, data, policy, or sources, just attach it instead of demanding proof of something and then trying to minimize the information you received without rising to the standard that you tried to set for others.

    Top
    #249879 - 07/17/22 02:43 PM Re: Elitism [Re: indigo]
    Kai Offline
    Member

    Registered: 05/17/09
    Posts: 647
    Originally Posted By: indigo
    Originally Posted By: Kai
    I view gifted programs that offer experiences to gifted students that would actually benefit more students than are given access to them to be elitist.
    At one point, advanced academics were provided based on student need for advanced material in order to learn something new.

    Then came a movement to provide advanced academics to those who need or may benefit from the the advanced material. The students who "may benefit from" the advanced academics often needed additional supports. An example was allowing students to enroll in AP courses, without having taken prerequisites. While focusing on this group, the needs of the highest group of students (gifted students) tended to be ignored.

    I am a proponent of expanding the number of seats in any gifted program or advanced academics to meet the number of pupils who qualify.


    I am as well. I am also a proponent of making sure that the offerings are focused on advanced academics that are appropriate for gifted students. So not merely acceleration into classes for average students and not "enrichment."

    And as far as qualifying goes, I am a proponent of making it essentially opt-in while at the same time ensuring that standards remain high. This means that students who opt in and for whom the work is too difficult are allowed to exit the program or class easily and without penalty. This is different from what you describe regarding AP classes being dumbed down to appeal to a larger group.

    Top
    #249886 - 07/20/22 10:39 AM Re: Elitism [Re: philly103]
    indigo Offline
    Member

    Registered: 04/27/13
    Posts: 4957
    Originally Posted By: philly103
    Originally Posted By: indigo
    Hello philly, how interesting of you to share what informs YOUR viewpoint, as though this must also be what has informed spaghetti's viewpoint.

    In the list of links which you provided, I find nothing newer than 5 years old, therefore I do question the current tense of spaghetti's statement that "in some places they are not recognizing minorities, children from impoverished backgrounds, etc."

    Although some may disagree, it makes sense to seek clarification, facts, data, policy, and source.

    It makes sense to seek clarification, etc. when we're talking about things that are rarely discussed or generally unknown, especially when it's an uninformed audience. But this isn't such a community. At the minimum, based on the frequency of your posting, you certainly don't post like you're an uninformed member of the community.

    So, you can understand my surprise when you start demanding proof for something that is heavily discussed in the gifted education space. You certainly have to come across it many, many times prior to this thread. If you don't agree with it then just say that instead of asking posters to jump through empty hoops.

    And it's not about what informs my perspective or spaghetti's, it's the information repeatedly discussed and shared by the people who research and engage this field. Similarly, the 5 years don't matter. If you have more recent facts, data, policy, or sources, just attach it instead of demanding proof of something and then trying to minimize the information you received without rising to the standard that you tried to set for others.

    It makes sense to seek clarification, facts, data, policy, and source when one has a question as to what has informed another's viewpoint. The gifted population, and those who study them, are not a monolith but represent a wide variety of backgrounds, experiences, and knowledge bases.

    Remaining on topic, I will share for the OP and all future readers of this thread, a reminder that correlation does not mean causation. This remains true regardless how often it may be implied otherwise. Regarding correlation/causation, these links may be of interest:
    1) How to Lie with Statistics (1954) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Lie_with_Statistics
    2) Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics

    When considering whether gifted education equates/translates to "Elitism," it is OK to disagree. It is also OK to seek clarification, facts, data, policy, and source which informs one's viewpoint.

    Top
    Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >


    Moderator:  M-Moderator 
    Recent Posts
    Out of level/early SAT
    by Vansh
    11:23 AM
    Aging
    by indigo
    12/01/22 01:33 PM
    WIAT-III outperforming WISC-V: 2e child
    by aeh
    11/30/22 08:17 PM
    The ultimate brag thread
    by Eagle Mum
    11/30/22 01:14 AM
    Q&A webinar for Davidson Young Scholars Program
    by indigo
    11/29/22 06:17 AM
    Davidson Institute Twitter