Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.


Learn about the Davidson Academy’s online campus for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S.

The Davidson Institute for Talent Development is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Davidson Fellows Scholarship
  • Davidson Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute
  • DITD FaceBook   DITD Twitter   DITD YouTube
    The Davidson Institute is on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube!

    How gifted-friendly is
    your state?

    Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update

    Who's Online
    1 registered (1 invisible), 0 Guests and 218 Spiders online.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    HushHush5309, optimisticmum, oop, Paribus, jemond75
    10955 Registered Users
    Su M Tu W Th F Sa
    1 2 3
    4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17
    18 19 20 21 22 23 24
    25 26 27 28 29 30
    Topic Options
    #248072 - 02/24/21 12:31 PM Careers in Medicine: Bioethics & Nuremberg code
    indigo Offline

    Registered: 04/27/13
    Posts: 4519
    Many gifted pupils, their parents, and school counselors consider potential careers when planning high school courses, college selection, and outside classes, camps, and projects.

    The Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH), provided by the U.S. Government Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is a great source of career information.

    When considering a broad range of occupations in healthcare or research, courses in medical ethics, bioethics, and/or legal compliance may be in one's future. A frequent starting point for self-study in this area may include the Nuremberg Code and its history.

    A copy of the Nuremberg Code is available to view online through the website of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Office of NIH History and Stetten Museum:

    While the downloadable PDF file of the Nuremberg Code is no longer available on the NIH website (, it is found on the WayBack Machine, Internet Archive:

    #248115 - 03/01/21 06:06 AM Re: Careers in Medicine: Bioethics & Nuremberg code [Re: indigo]
    indigo Offline

    Registered: 04/27/13
    Posts: 4519
    Originally Posted By: indigo
    For students contemplating careers in medicine: ethics in research, reporting, and patient records remain crucial to maintaining personal integrity, trust in science and medicine, and having a positive influence on individual healthcare choices, as well as public health.

    The study retracted by The Lancet is found here:
    1) online link
    (backed up on WayBack Machine, Internet Archive, over 1,600 times)

    2) downloadable 10-page PDF
    (backed up on WayBack Machine, Internet Archive, over 70 times)

    3) retraction
    (backed up on WayBack Machine, Internet Archive, over 220 times)

    4) retraction PDF
    (backed up on WayBack Machine, Internet Archive, over 20 times)

    Interestingly, the study itself asserts: "The data collection and analyses are deemed exempt from ethics review."
    In the PDF, this is found on page 3/10, just above the first red "E" in the word "RETRACTED."

    In The Lancet's retraction statement, The Lancet said, in part:
    We always aspire to perform our research in accordance with the highest ethical and professional guidelines. We can never forget the responsibility we have as researchers to scrupulously ensure that we rely on data sources that adhere to our high standards. Based on this development, we can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources.

    Gifted persons interested in careers in science, research, and medicine must be self-disciplined to adhere to ethical standards, even when it may seem inconvenient or less than expedient.

    Ethics in medicine and research remain important now, as in the past, and while errors/omissions/breaches of ethics may be found more quickly now, the misinformation may have already been repeated and been accepted.

    Broadly accepted views attempting to censor new information, such as the early outpatient treatments for COVID-19, is reminiscent of similar events in history:
    - flat-earth believers attempting to silence evidence that the earth was spherical,
    - geocenterists attempting to refute evidence of heliocenterism: that the earth rotates around the sun, not the other way around.

    Science is never settled.


    Moderator:  M-Moderator 
    Recent Posts
    cancelling of humanities studies
    by aquinas
    02:12 PM
    books for adults
    by indigo
    11:24 AM
    Analogy: Advocacy as a Non-Newtonian Fluid
    by indigo
    07:28 AM
    OAGC/ODE Gifted Education under COVID
    by indigo
    07:04 AM
    Math and discrepancies on WISC
    by aeh
    03:32 PM
    Davidson Institute Twitter