Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links
DITD Logo

Learn about the Davidson Academy’s online campus for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S.

The Davidson Institute for Talent Development is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Davidson Fellows Scholarship
  • Davidson Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute
  • DITD FaceBook   DITD Twitter   DITD YouTube
    The Davidson Institute is on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube!

    How gifted-friendly is
    your state?

    Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update

    Who's Online
    0 registered (), 0 Guests and 250 Spiders online.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Clara Tim, markhogue, John Henderson, wm97, oliviazimmerman
    10844 Registered Users
    October
    Su M Tu W Th F Sa
    1 2 3
    4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17
    18 19 20 21 22 23 24
    25 26 27 28 29 30 31
    Topic Options
    #247587 - 09/21/20 02:29 AM Thoughts on work of Drs E Frattura & C Capper?
    indigo Offline
    Member

    Registered: 04/27/13
    Posts: 4293
    How familiar are you with the work of Dr Elise Frattura & Dr Collen Capper?

    Quick summary: Books/Publications/Services -
    1-Leading for Social Justice: Transforming Schools for All Learners (2007)
    2-Meeting the Needs of Students of All Abilities: Leading Beyond Inclusion (2nd edition) (2009)
    3-Educational Administration in a Pluralistic Society
    4-Capper is editor of Routledge series: Leadership for Equity and Diversity
    5-Integrated Comprehensive Systems for Equity (ICSE)

    Your Thoughts? Observations? Experiences?
    Among all the full range of diversity listed ("including race, culture, social class, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, ability, language, religion and their intersections"), I do not see academic/intellectual diversity. For example, I do not find acknowledgement of differences in innate ability, native intelligence, IQ, learning capacity, intellectual curiosity, motivation, or interest. Lack of inclusion of these elements appears to deny science and data regarding brain research, neuroscience, psychology.

    Although much of the material repeats a theme of avoiding LABELS, it seems that more labels are being applied to students (and teachers) under this plan. For example, cluster grouping of students is not according to ability and readiness to learn, but rather classrooms are to be demographically heterogeneous and and are to contain balanced diversity representative of the population... suggesting that children (and teachers) must disclose and the school must maintain a record of each individual's: race, culture, social class, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, ability, language, religion.

    If I understanding correctly, the Frattura/Capper approach places the onus on the teacher(s), not the student, if the student may be failing, falling behind, and/or showing a performance gap in learning as compared with other students assigned to that teacher or teaching team.

    I have seen the work of Frattura & Capper paired with edited, abbreviated lists of John Hattie's infuencers: highly valuing effects of peer tutoring, development in lock-step with peers (Piagetian programming)... disregarding factors such as prior ability, acceleration, effort.

    The heterogeneous grouping strategy also appears to counter the work of Miraca Gross, who found that gifted students need appropriate academic challenge and true intellectual peers. Lack of meeting these needs may lead to underachievement and a host of other developmental problems, as noted in this article:
    Stretching the Gifted
    by Emily Parkinson
    Financial Review
    August 16, 2015
    Originally Posted By: article: Stretching the Gifted
    If your kids are bright they won't do well in Australian classrooms," says renowned educational researcher Professor John Hattie.

    He's talking about the top 40 per cent of students, he says, but the problem is worse still if your child is one of the 10 per cent or so of Australian students regarded as gifted.

    . . .

    Underachievement in gifted students is a national problem, he says, with the proportion of Australian students achieving at the highest level in maths and science in annual decline since 2000, currently sitting at about 15 per cent compared to 40 per cent for those high-achieving nations.

    Stretching our brightest kids to achieve their potential became the basis for a Victorian parliamentary inquiry into gifted and talented education in June 2012.

    It found that between 10 and 50 per cent of all gifted school students fail to perform at levels at which they are capable, often leading on to behavioral issues and mental health problems. A significant number, somewhere between 10 and 40 per cent, drop out before completing Year 12, the inquiry found.


    Do you have thoughts, observations, experiences, questions, impressions to share?
    Does the Frattura/Capper plan appear to be a one-size-fits-all approach, for gifted-deniers?
    Am I missing something?

    Top
    #247589 - 09/21/20 07:09 AM Re: Thoughts on work of Drs E Frattura & C Capper? [Re: indigo]
    Eagle Mum Offline
    Member

    Registered: 02/24/20
    Posts: 64
    Loc: Australia
    I’m not familiar with the two authors, but note that you have included an excerpt about the declining PISA performance of Australian students, which some experts believe may be due, at least in part, to the under recognition and poor support for gifted students in comprehensive schools. In some states, the number of public selective schools has increased as the main means to cater for gifted kids, but there are a number of problems with this approach as there are few such schools in rural areas, there are no catchment boundaries (many students travel hours each day to attend the school where they were offered a place on the basis of a competitive exam) and a large proportion of successful candidates have been heavily coached for the entrance exam.

    A new ‘High potential and gifted education’ policy (https://education.nsw.gov.au/teaching-an...ducation-policy) was announced in 2019, which will ‘promote engagement and challenge for every student, regardless of background, in every school across intellectual, creative, social-emotional and physical domains.’ ‘It supports every student to achieve their educational potential, through talent development opportunities and differentiated teaching and learning practices to ensure that their specific learning and wellbeing needs are met.’ The intents sound very well meaning - will be interesting to see how they enact their policy.

    Top
    #247595 - 09/22/20 05:00 AM Re: Thoughts on work of Drs E Frattura & C Capper? [Re: indigo]
    Wren Offline
    Member

    Registered: 01/14/08
    Posts: 1553
    Maybe covid will push the development of customized education so that kids can work along their own educational speed and capacity. There are so many more options out there, coursera, Khan plus the expensive CTY and Stanford options. My kid has used CTY, did a self study AP in Chinese and now does some coursera in her marine science/oceanography area. And because of her school's covid trimester system, has precalc in May and June, so is doing Khan precalc during the year instead. So are a number of her classmates. Customization is a good thing for gifted students.

    Top
    #247596 - 09/22/20 06:00 AM Re: Thoughts on work of Drs E Frattura & C Capper? [Re: indigo]
    Kai Offline
    Member

    Registered: 05/17/09
    Posts: 603
    Originally Posted By: indigo
    Your Thoughts? Observations? Experiences?
    Among all the full range of diversity listed ("including race, culture, social class, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, ability, language, religion and their intersections"), I do not see academic/intellectual diversity. For example, I do not find acknowledgement of differences in innate ability, native intelligence, IQ, learning capacity, intellectual curiosity, motivation, or interest. Lack of inclusion of these elements appears to deny science and data regarding brain research, neuroscience, psychology.


    "Critical" social justice "theory" has no room for individual difference when it comes to intelligence, nor does it place any stock in science. The only legitimate differences among people are the "approved" identities that are listed in the quote you provided.

    Top
    #247598 - 09/22/20 08:52 AM Re: Thoughts on work of Drs E Frattura & C Capper? [Re: Kai]
    indigo Offline
    Member

    Registered: 04/27/13
    Posts: 4293
    Originally Posted By: Kai
    "Critical" social justice "theory" has no room for individual difference when it comes to intelligence, nor does it place any stock in science. The only legitimate differences among people are the "approved" identities that are listed in the quote you provided.
    More than 60 years ago, Manning Johnson witnessed the inception of this trend, and wrote this book.

    Interesting juxtapositions:
    - the work of Frattura & Capper, with that of Miraca Gross.
    - the work of Frattura & Capper, with that of Manning Johnson.

    Top
    #247678 - 10/12/20 06:33 PM Re: Thoughts on work of Drs E Frattura & C Capper? [Re: indigo]
    wm97 Offline
    Junior Member

    Registered: 10/11/20
    Posts: 3
    From my own experience, it would be folly to expect any standard school to properly address the gifted student. Schools are production factories. They are focused on what they produce most - people of average abilities. They are stocked by people of average abilities.

    If a high school has a thousand students, then it should have 20 that would qualify for Mensa. That's five students per grade, each of which probably has different interests.

    As for the teachers, statistically there would not even be one Mensa qualifier in the average school. Even if they had an interest in the gifted, they probably wouldn't know what to do with it, and/or couldn't keep up.

    If their work laid out a perfect plan for gifted education, how many schools could really make it work? My guess is less than the fingers on your hand, nationwide.

    From my own family's experience, I gave up any hope that any general school system would adequately address the gifted. If you do the math, it just doesn't make much sense for the system to spend time on it. (And that's true despite the fact that your child is wonderful.)

    Top


    Moderator:  M-Moderator 
    Recent Posts
    Need guidance: math placement in middle school
    by Nolepharm
    10/24/20 12:44 PM
    Career/taking control of my life at 26
    by raphael
    10/22/20 12:59 PM
    URL for NWEA 2015 MAP score/percentile converter
    by philly103
    10/22/20 12:48 PM
    Full time in person learning-accommodati
    on for ADD

    by OCJD
    10/21/20 01:16 PM
    The Politics of Gifted Education
    by indigo
    10/21/20 08:25 AM
    Davidson Institute Twitter