Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links
DITD Logo

Learn about the Davidson Academy’s online campus for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S.

The Davidson Institute for Talent Development is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Davidson Fellows Scholarship
  • Davidson Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute
  • DITD FaceBook   DITD Twitter   DITD YouTube
    The Davidson Institute is on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube!

    How gifted-friendly is
    your state?

    Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update

    Who's Online
    1 registered (jolip), 0 Guests and 223 Spiders online.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Gxtd, NYC2011, varsha dongre, Caril, Happy Dolphin
    10643 Registered Users
    November
    Su M Tu W Th F Sa
    1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    Topic Options
    #245735 - 06/24/19 03:32 AM Does this look a 2e profile?
    sh77 Offline
    New Member

    Registered: 06/17/19
    Posts: 1
    Hello

    My son is 8 and was recently evaluated by an Ed Psych as I felt he was bright but not reaching his potential. The assessment confirmed a spiky profile and low processing. I would be very grateful for opinions on his scores and whether this looks like a 2e profile? He was assessed using the WASI 2, WRAT 4, and British Ability Scales 3.

    His block design was very discrepant and I'll take him t an OT for further assessment.

    WASI 2:
    Block design: Centile 9; T score 40; Age <6.2
    Vocabulary: Centile 98; T score 66; Age 11.2
    Matrix reasoning: Centile 86; T score 58; Age 10.6
    Similarities: Centile 98; T score 65; Age 11.2
    VCI 124 95% Superior
    PRI 98 45% Average


    An FSIQ was not given due to high variation in scores.

    WRAT 4:
    Maths computation: Centile 98; standardised score 130 (upper extreme)
    Spelling: Centile 91; standardised score 120; category superior.

    BAS 3

    Speed of informational processing: Centile 16; T score 40; Age 6.1
    Recall of digits forward: Centile 50; T score 50; Age 8.3
    Recall of objects immediate verbal: centile 69; T score 55; age 9.3.


    Many thanks.

    Top
    #245762 - 06/27/19 10:39 PM Re: Does this look a 2e profile? [Re: sh77]
    Portia Offline
    Member

    Registered: 03/17/13
    Posts: 1760
    Hello sh77,

    Welcome to the boards! I apologize that I am just seeing your post. Sometimes there is a delay for new posters and then the post gets lost in the thread.

    We have a frequent poster, aeh, who is incredibly generous with time and knowledge. I will defer specific responses to him.

    From an overall view, large separations can be an indication of asynchrony in development. It is good an OT is going to do a further evaluation of the block design. Block design could also indicate a visual processing difficulty, which an OT may not pick up. How is his handwriting? Does he like to play with things like Legos and puzzles? How is his artwork? How are his fine motor skills?

    What concerns are you seeing which prompted the Ed Psych evaluation? Sometimes the testing just gives a snapshot, but when you combine that with information from the home and school environment, context helps with interpretations.

    Top
    #245798 - 07/01/19 05:26 PM Re: Does this look a 2e profile? [Re: sh77]
    aeh Offline
    Member

    Registered: 04/26/14
    Posts: 3448
    Welcome! My apologies for the delay; I've been on limited internet.

    Your DC's cognitive profile does have some consistencies suggesting slow processing speed in general, possibly specifically fine-motor speed, and I do agree with following up with an OT. The two measures of working memory are average, which most likely is an unremarkable finding (unless you have IRL data that would suggest otherwise). While some individuals with above average cognition have working memory to match, many do not.

    At the moment, the two screening measures of academic achievement are consistent with best estimates of his cognition, but are limited in scope. What caused you to wonder about underachievement?

    Top
    #245918 - 08/18/19 12:02 PM Re: Does this look a 2e profile? [Re: sh77]
    Anisotropic Offline
    Junior Member

    Registered: 12/09/18
    Posts: 15
    Are you sure those numbers are all correct? The T-scores and percentiles don't seem to match up for the WASI.
    _________________________
    "The thing that doesn't fit is the most interesting."
    -Richard Feynman

    Top
    #245919 - 08/18/19 07:25 PM Re: Does this look a 2e profile? [Re: Anisotropic]
    aeh Offline
    Member

    Registered: 04/26/14
    Posts: 3448
    Nice catch, Anisotropic! Even so, the profile is still worth investigating, whether the %iles or the T scores are the actual numbers. Also note that the UK norms appear to be slightly less consistent with the US norms between the WISC and the WASI, especially at the younger ages.

    Top


    Moderator:  M-Moderator 
    Recent Posts
    How Expected Family Contribution is calculated
    by Bostonian
    Today at 03:33 PM
    Ivy League Admissions.
    by Wren
    Today at 03:24 PM
    Which colleges have good teaching?
    by puffin
    Yesterday at 06:59 PM
    Functional difficulties caused by ADHD?
    by puffin
    Yesterday at 06:55 PM
    Score Extrapolations?
    by Pabulum
    11/13/19 01:58 PM
    Davidson Institute Twitter