Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 366 guests, and 14 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Emerson Wong, Markas, HarryKevin91, Gingtto, SusanRoth
    11,429 Registered Users
    May
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    A
    aquinas Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    Please feel free to use this thread as an open discussion of the genetic component of ability as related to gifted education. As with the "quirky anecdote", "brag", and "you know you're parenting a gifted child when..." threads, please feel free to include ad hoc comments on the topic here.


    What is to give light must endure burning.
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Any conversation about genetic determinism has to, IMO, be prefaced with the understanding that, as the science of the human genome is essentially in its infancy, it can't be tinkered with due to ethical concerns, and the current methods of investigation are prone to causation fallacies at this stage, it has to be treated with a healthy dose of skepticism. It wouldn't be entirely inaccurate to say that in some ways we're looking at the 21st century version of phrenology.

    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,298
    Dude, I could not agree more.

    I think it would be a good idea to create a set of guidelines for the responsible use of new tests for genetics and traits.

    So for example, this would include


    • Testing the technology to make sure it's generally safe under a given set of conditions
    • In the case of things like DNA tests for [insert trait], recognizing that results from early tests will be more likely to be of lower quality. So initial results should be interpreted with extreme caution and should not used for making decisions.
    • All results of new tests should be supported with very strong evidence from older and better-understood methods.
    • Testers should use a variety of analysis methods on data from new tests. In particular, a p-value is not enough. That last phrase describes my philosophy WRT science experiments.


    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    A
    aquinas Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    All good input so far.

    Furthermore, to piggyback on Val’s last bullet point, I’d add that such tests should show a high level of test-retest reliability; be sufficiently generalizable outside the calibration sample so as to produce reproducible results; be tested and recalibrated in large, long-lived panel samples that are representative of the general population and; where possible, be examined in twin studies against a vector of descriptive variables to control somewhat for confounding environmental factors.


    What is to give light must endure burning.
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Case in point: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/...g-but-it-might-not-be-smart-to-take-one/

    Quote
    As of now, the predictions are not highly accurate. The DNA variations that have been linked to test scores explain less than 10 percent of the intelligence differences between the people of European ancestry who’ve been studied.

    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 1,453
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Mar 2013
    Posts: 1,453
    Nothing genetic is entirely pre-ordained. The egg left to get cold doesn’t hatch...


    Become what you are

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by indigo - 05/01/24 05:21 PM
    Technology may replace 40% of jobs in 15 years
    by indigo - 04/30/24 12:27 AM
    NAGC Tip Sheets
    by indigo - 04/29/24 08:36 AM
    Employers less likely to hire from IVYs
    by Wren - 04/29/24 03:43 AM
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5