Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    1 members (aeh), 251 guests, and 21 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    streble, DeliciousPizza, prominentdigitiz, parentologyco, Smartlady60
    11,413 Registered Users
    March
    S M T W T F S
    1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 4 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 11
    VR00 #236004 01/22/17 05:57 PM
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,244
    Likes: 1
    I
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    I
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,244
    Likes: 1
    Originally Posted by VR00
    There has to be a way of putting more power to the parents of the children.
    Agreed.
    - Making one's voice known to legislators and advocacy groups is one way in which parents can exercise their power.
    - Advocacy at various levels is another way for parents to exercise power.
    - Knowledge is power. Reviewing the Federal Register may help acquaint parents with current issues, on a timely basis.
    - Running for office, from school board to alderman to State and National offices is another way for parents to exercise power.
    - Creating micro-schools is another.
    - Exercising one's power by homeschooling is another.

    Originally Posted by VR00
    ...Vouchers are the only real idea anyone has come up with to put power into the hands of the parents.
    Vouchers may put another choice or option before parents, and in some cases these may be viable options... in other cases the voucher schools or charters may present a distinction without a difference for the children who attend them.

    There is good and bad in everything. The current educational system arose under a previous administration, and the current administration has indicated it wishes to place "outsiders" in many roles. It remains to be seen how much DeVos may change the Department of Education, and how much the Department of Education may change her.

    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 181
    V
    VR00 Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    V
    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 181
    Originally Posted by indigo
    There is good and bad in everything. The current educational system arose under a previous administration, and the current administration has indicated it wishes to place "outsiders" in many roles. It remains to be seen how much DeVos may change the Department of Education, and how much the Department of Education may change her.

    Well said. But from all I have read she wants to do the right thing. Why else would she try to spend so much of her own money in tangling with this thankless problem. She could do as so many others do, send your kids to private school/wealthy district and ignore the problem.

    VR00 #236006 01/22/17 07:24 PM
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,296
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,296
    Originally Posted by VR00
    Originally Posted by HowlerKarma
    In light of my experiences as a parent with an HG+ child in a virtual charter school ... I find this nomination abhorrent in every way.

    We have endured the kind of "choice" that she is apparently championing. It's what got my daughter 32 hours of scheduled instruction the year that she took second year German in high school. Oh-- and about 15 hours of instructional support of any kind the year that she took AP Statistics. Yes, I said "year."

    Not sure I entirely follow here. When I look outside-in Detroit has a history of miserable public schools which doomed generations of kids. My understanding of the concept Devos championed is of allowing parents to pull kids out and send them to private schools with vouchers.

    DeVos is a huge proponent of charter schools.

    Speaking of Detroit:

    Originally Posted by Washington Post
    DeVos ... has also been a force behind the spread of charter schools in Michigan, most of which have recorded student test scores in reading and math below the state average. ...

    In Brightmoor, the only high school left is Detroit Community Schools, a charter boasting more than a decade of abysmal test scores and, until recently, a superintendent who earned $130,000 a year despite a dearth of educational experience or credentials.

    On the west side, another charter school, Hope Academy, has been serving the community around Grand River and Livernois for 20 years. Its test scores have been among the lowest in the state throughout those two decades; in 2013 the school ranked in the first percentile, the absolute bottom for academic performance. Two years later, its charter was renewed.

    It sounds to me like charter schools are not exactly saving education in Detroit --- in spite of not having to follow all those burdensome regulations the public schools have to follow, like taking all comers.

    IMO, there's a lot of ideology driving the "school choice" movement. Certainly, the facts aren't driving it, given the above and the performances of many other charters (e.g. Magnolia Science Academy, which has closed 3+ schools due to financial irregularities).

    Not to mention VR00's disparaging of Detroit public schools while sparing the charters' equally bad performance. Unless I've missed some alternative facts ( confused ), this is ideology talking.


    Yes, there are problems in public schools, and they're caused in part by factors I noted above. But it seems to me that lack of oversight in charter schools creates problems with equivalent results (poor education). Yet advocates for charter schools will still make excuses for them, because...ideology.

    We will never fix our education problems until we stop looking to free market solutions on one side or the status quo on the other. But as I said, I don't think that Betsy DeVos cares about fixing problems so much as...something else. Perhaps, something like building God's kingdom. Gee, I didn't know that Jerry Falwell was Trump's first pick for Secretary of Education.


    Val #236007 01/22/17 09:13 PM
    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 181
    V
    VR00 Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    V
    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 181
    Originally Posted by Val
    Not to mention VR00's disparaging of Detroit public schools while sparing the charters' equally bad performance. Unless I've missed some alternative facts ( confused ), this is ideology talking.

    Val, Are you disagreeing about the assessment of Detriot schools?
    I never argued that all charter schools are going to be great. My only experience with one is Davidson Academy which would not exist if they had to accept whoever applies.

    The argument is for putting the choice in parents hands. One needs to believe that parents know what is good for their children. I cannot count how many times I have stood before a school official who says "They know what is best for the kid". You and I can walk and pay for any number of alternate options as you described. What choice does a poor parent have?

    I am not sure why there is so much venom against a person who wants to provide this choice. If the parents want to spend the money on parochial education why should we stand in their way? Some of the best schools in the country started as parochial schools. The answer is some reasonable form of accreditation.

    No idea why the Jerry Falwell boogieman argument is thrown in here.

    Last edited by VR00; 01/22/17 09:44 PM.
    Val #236009 01/22/17 09:55 PM
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,244
    Likes: 1
    I
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    I
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,244
    Likes: 1
    Val, interesting article.

    1) I would tend to agree that low test scores would be a red flag. But not under all circumstances... For example: Many people are opposed to excessive "standardized testing" and "teaching to the test". One of the functions of standardized testing is to influence/persuade/pressure schools to adopt CCSS (or else the school's test scores would be low). Some teachers have stated that children with the readiness and ability to work on advanced curriculum are not allowed to do so, as studying advanced material which is not on the grade-level standardized test may result in a lower score.

    I would want to know more. For example:
    - Does this school teach to the test?
    - Does this school use a curriculum which is not aligned to the standardized test topics and timing?
    - Does this school follow a different set of standards which is believed to serve the local community well?
    - Is there project-based learning?
    - Are students developing and exhibiting internal locus of control? (Do they "own" their educational decisions?)
    - Are there other measures which indicate learning and growth? (Writing essays, presenting speeches, etc)

    If the educational progress truly is substandard, are there environmental factors which may be exhibiting a negative influence? (Specific to Detroit, MI... is any delay in educational progress directly attributable to lead which has been found in drinking water?)

    2) IMO, An excessive salary, which is not commensurate with experience, credentials, and results is a red flag. I would want to know more. For example:
    - What are the job's minimum and preferred qualifications?
    - What is the industry salary range and mid-point for the position?
    - What is the job description?
    - What duties does the job entail?
    - What are the goals for the position?
    - What are the expectations for learning curve, performance review, feedback, follow-up, accountability, dismissal, etc?

    3) Financial irregularities are a red flag. I would want to know:
    - was one person embezzling?
    - was there a widespread, pervasive, systemic problem?

    4) Because there is good and bad in everything, for each decision made, I would want to know:
    - Who benefits?
    - Who is empowered?
    - What are the constraints/parameters?
    - Who are the decision makers?
    - What are the PROs and CONs?
    - How to minimize the downside/drawbacks/negatives?
    - How will we know if the decision is achieving the desired results?
    - How frequently will the decision be reviewed? By whom?
    - Who will be notified of decisions? By what means?
    I believe the focus must always be on the benefit to the student, and by extension, the student's family. A focus on benefiting or growing anything else (such as data collection, research, government, business profit, union salary and benefits) is a red flag.

    5) There may be over-paid individuals in both the private sector and government. Ideally, in a perfect world, each entity may provide balance and a reality check for the other.

    6) The current education system was developed under a series of different administrations. It remains to be seen how much DeVos may change the Department of Education, and how much the Department of Education may change DeVos.

    VR00 #236011 01/22/17 10:35 PM
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,244
    Likes: 1
    I
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    I
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,244
    Likes: 1
    Originally Posted by VR00
    The argument is for putting the choice in parents hands. One needs to believe that parents know what is good for their children.
    I believe it is important to encourage parents in this. smile
    - Some people may begin development of this skill in childhood, effortlessly as if by osmosis while casually observing their parents... and later as parents themselves leverage these memories in being supportive to the next generation.
    - Other parents, without having had the benefit of someone to emulate in developing this skill, may learn as adults how to identify what their child needs to flourish.

    Originally Posted by VR00
    The answer is some reasonable form of accreditation.
    Or strong local control... holding a school accountable specifically to students and parents. In this context, strong bottom-up local control may somewhat minimize top-down influence of DeVos and/or Department of Education.

    VR00 #236013 01/22/17 11:45 PM
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,296
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,296
    Originally Posted by VR00
    Originally Posted by Val
    Not to mention VR00's disparaging of Detroit public schools while sparing the charters' equally bad performance. Unless I've missed some alternative facts ( confused ), this is ideology talking.

    Val, Are you disagreeing about the assessment of Detriot schools?

    I'm saying that you criticized the Detroit public schools for failing students, but ignored the fact that charter schools have a bad-to-rock-bottom record in Detroit. Charters are heavily promoted by DeVos, yet you've said she's a good choice who wants to "do the right thing."

    Surely, someone who wants to do the right thing would be critical of these poorly performing schools. But she defends them. Alternative facts?

    "School choice" is a myth for a majority of Americans that's promoted by people with an agenda all their own.


    NB: The DA isn't a charter school. It's a public school with an IQ cutoff (like the HG+ schools in LA and many other similar public schools in the US).

    VR00 #236014 01/23/17 07:10 AM
    Joined: May 2013
    Posts: 2,155
    B
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: May 2013
    Posts: 2,155
    What exactly are charter schools? Because here, they are public schools and they have to take anyone who applies if there is space (if there isn't, they hold a lottery). They have to do the State standards and they have to give the State tests. The main difference is that the school board is pretty much hand-selected rather than elected and if there is a property tax referendum (which can be as much as 15 percent of a district's budget, maybe more), they are not eligible for that. Kids are even bused to charters, if they live within the school district boundaries where the charter is located. I always find it ironic how public school districts claim they are going to have to cut basically everything if a referendum doesn't pass, yet charters do fine without that money. Many charters don't have a lot of extracurriculars though, the way most public school districts do.

    Our public district was threatening all sorts of cuts if voters didn't approve the latest levy...like cutting special ed, teachers, increasing class sizes (many elementary classes now have more than 30 kids, even though they DID pass the levy), eliminating music programs, eliminating sports, etc. etc. Most of those cuts ended up happening even though the voters gave them the money. Our Super is paid about $230,000 if you include benefits, which is ridiculous considering how much they gripe about their budget issues. With salaries like that, then it makes sense they can't afford to have school 5 days per week and need to put 40 students in a class if a levy doesn't pass. So even public districts are subject to corruption. Ours is a classic example and there are multiple lawsuits from a parent group currently pending against the district for conflicts of interest, violating open meeting laws, closing school buildings even though they don't have a valid reason and financially don't need to, etc. People complain about laws and mandates but I would actually like to see more. For instance, they can't give themselves salary raises if they are cutting programs, cutting teachers, increasing class sizes, closing schools, etc.

    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,244
    Likes: 1
    I
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    I
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,244
    Likes: 1
    Originally Posted by blackcat
    What exactly are charter schools?
    Here is the full description of charter schools from wikipedia. While the entries on wikipedia are crowd-sourced and anyone can contribute to them, the entries often contain a bibliography of meaningful, credible, authoritative source documents in their "References" section, located at the end of the entry.

    Here is the wikipedia entry on school vouchers.

    Here is a research report on school choice:
    Empirical Evidence on School Choice, 4th edition, by Dr. Greg Forster Ph.D., May 2016, Friedman Foundation.
    This is one of many available on the website edchoice.org.

    The current US public education system has developed under other administrations; It remains to be seen how much DeVos may change the US Department of Education and how much the US Department of Education may change DeVos.

    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,296
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,296
    Originally Posted by blackcat
    What exactly are charter schools? Because here, they are public schools and they have to take anyone who applies if there is space (if there isn't, they hold a lottery).

    This rule is usually true on paper, but not in practice. For example, see this report by Reuters about the many ways that charter schools get around it. The quoted information bellow is only a small portion of what the journalists learned.

    Originally Posted by Reuters report
    Among the barriers that Reuters documented:

    * Applications that are made available just a few hours a year.

    * Lengthy application forms, often printed only in English, that require student and parent essays, report cards, test scores, disciplinary records, teacher recommendations and medical records.

    * Demands that students present Social Security cards and birth certificates for their applications to be considered, even though such documents cannot be required under federal law.

    * Mandatory family interviews.

    * Assessment exams.

    * Academic prerequisites.

    * Requirements that applicants document any disabilities or special needs. The U.S. Department of Education considers this practice illegal on the college level but has not addressed the issue for K-12 schools.

    It's a lack of oversight thing.

    Page 4 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 11

    Moderated by  M-Moderator, Mark D. 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Testing with accommodations
    by aeh - 03/27/24 01:58 PM
    Quotations that resonate with gifted people
    by indigo - 03/27/24 12:38 PM
    New, and you'd think I'd have a clue...
    by astronomama - 03/24/24 06:01 AM
    For those interested in astronomy, eclipses...
    by indigo - 03/23/24 06:11 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5