Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 286 guests, and 16 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Word_Nerd93, jenjunpr, calicocat, Heidi_Hunter, Dilore
    11,421 Registered Users
    April
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28 29 30
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 2 of 2 1 2
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Originally Posted by Bostonian
    Originally Posted by ultramarina
    I'm just now reading this post and am mystified by the quote you chose to pull, Bostonian.
    I quoted the first three paragraphs and provided a link to the full article.

    Point, Bostonian.

    15-love

    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,245
    Likes: 1
    I
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    I
    Joined: Apr 2013
    Posts: 5,245
    Likes: 1
    Like many topics which repeat on the forums, this article from the National Bureau of Economic Research and dated November 2015, seems closely related to an article dated September 2014 and discussed in a thread at that time: Does Gifted Education Work? For Which Students?

    Originally Posted by aeh
    who were cognitively qualified
    It may be worth keeping in mind that the report states these students qualified using lower criteria: IQ 116 rather than IQ 130.

    Originally Posted by aeh
    a significant fraction of them were able to make up the difference
    It does not suggest that they made up the difference, just that they made more rapid gains during the time period measured.

    Originally Posted by aeh
    despite lack of access to quality instruction previously
    A variety of factors may have been in play limiting their prior achievements; This is not necessarily due to lack of access to quality instruction previously.

    Originally Posted by aeh
    Alternatively, it may be that the conventionally-identified students were not receiving sufficiently challenging instruction, even within the GT program.
    BINGO! Unfortunately, capping the growth of the top students is one means of closing the achievement gap, excellence gap, or opportunity gap.

    Page 2 of 2 1 2

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Jo Boaler and Gifted Students
    by thx1138 - 04/12/24 02:37 PM
    For those interested in astronomy, eclipses...
    by indigo - 04/08/24 12:40 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5