Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 217 guests, and 23 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    Word_Nerd93, jenjunpr, calicocat, Heidi_Hunter, Dilore
    11,421 Registered Users
    April
    S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28 29 30
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 761
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 761
    Another thing that comes to mind for me - unless our boys get true full rides at whatever college or university they decide to attend, we expect them to WORK to help with supporting themselves in college. We would not be able to pay for their college if they went in at 12 or 13 years old. We want them to be old enough to be financially responsible or co-responsible for their higher eduction.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Good point, CFK.

    I did concede that there are countless things which I absolutely do NOT know here:

    Quote
    It's one thing if the child is the one in a hurry-- many, many HG+ children are like that. For all I know, this is the case in the Harding clan.

    Eventually I figured out what rubbed me so much the wrong way about it, though-- it wasn't that this particular family has sent their own kids to college at very young ages. It's that they seem to be advocating that this is a perfectly legitimate thing for parents to decide to DO to their kids, and oh look, I conveniently happen to be selling the tools to make it happen.

    Strikes me as cashing in at least a little, and a bit disingenuous at best. I certainly wouldn't dream that parenting a HG+ child entitles me to write a book about how to homeschool such children, nevermind homeschooling MG children (which I truthfully know very little about).

    So that is the part that bugged me about it. It came off as a bit infomercial-ish.


    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    N
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    N
    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    I'm certain that the Harding kids are very bright/gifted, but look at the colleges they attended/attend. They mention Faulkner University and Huntingdon College (both in Alabama). Take a look at the College Board website to see the 25%-75% percentile SAT scores for those schools. Not so great...how do gifted kids benefit by going to schools where the average SAT score is below the national average? Bright 12 years old kids going to college with 20 year olds that might be "not-so-good" students. Why not wait a few years and have them attend a good college with academic peers?

    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    P
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    It seems unlikely that most or even many children can skip 6 years. A lot could skip 1, I think most homes hooked bright kids could skip 2 (if they had enough attention - I'm not sure the time wasting prevention arguement works if you are one of 6 kids under 10 including 2 year old triplets (there seem to be some very large families on the WTM boards. I do know as a child the time wasting really annoyed me and I am MG at best.

    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 1,694
    From discussion elsewhere I get the impression that the Hardings are adamant their kids are not gifted, and indicate in their book that their kids are getting credits/passing, not top of their class - it sounds like they are making average achievement but at high speed. I would not ever have that as a goal as a homeschooler. Oddly though in lower primary, for my Hg+ DD, I would rather she was sitting closer to the (upper) middle than the very top of her class. Personality wise she's not suited to being way out in front. She'll work to keep up or catch up so she's well placed in the class, but equally she'll work to hang back and blend in (or you could see this as slacking off ecause she can). Observably the best in the class is not her goal or her happy place. She'd be better off homeschooled, but she'd rocket ahead without the variety of ways that school puts the brakes on.

    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 954
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 954
    Quote
    From discussion elsewhere I get the impression that the Hardings are adamant their kids are not gifted, and indicate in their book that their kids are getting credits/passing, not top of their class

    Quote
    They mention Faulkner University and Huntingdon College (both in Alabama). Take a look at the College Board website to see the 25%-75% percentile SAT scores for those schools.

    I fail to understand what exactly the Hardings think they are doing for their children then?

    Middling grades at a middling college... so, they'll be 18 looking for jobs with a mediocre degree instead of 22 or older? How is that a good thing?


    ~amy
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    My question precisely.


    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 761
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 761
    They might have to take couple gap years after college ...

    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 143
    P
    Pru Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 143
    We have two gifted children and I don't think I could handle a third. How do these people handle ten? By my accounting that would be almost six hours of hyperventilating fits per day, three hours of anxiety, two hours of trying to get them to actually say what they feel, and three hours of fighting and peacemaking. Then we would try doing some schooling.

    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    A
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    A
    Joined: Nov 2012
    Posts: 2,513
    Originally Posted by Pru
    We have two gifted children and I don't think I could handle a third. How do these people handle ten? By my accounting that would be almost six hours of hyperventilating fits per day, three hours of anxiety, two hours of trying to get them to actually say what they feel, and three hours of fighting and peacemaking. Then we would try doing some schooling.

    Ha! I marvel at people with two!

    I am, quite frankly, terrified of having another child like DS before he is, at the very least, in kindergarten. He is a true labour of love and my greatest joy, but I fear my health and sanity would be seriously compromised if our second child exhibited the same intellectual horsepower and intensity that DS possesses.

    That being said, if I could be assured of my sanity, I would love to have another child.


    What is to give light must endure burning.
    Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

    Moderated by  M-Moderator, Mark D. 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Beyond IQ: The consequences of ignoring talent
    by Eagle Mum - 04/21/24 03:55 PM
    Testing with accommodations
    by blackcat - 04/17/24 08:15 AM
    Jo Boaler and Gifted Students
    by thx1138 - 04/12/24 02:37 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5