Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 167 guests, and 10 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    parentologyco, Smartlady60, petercgeelan, eterpstra, Valib90
    11,410 Registered Users
    March
    S M T W T F S
    1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 26 of 28 1 2 24 25 26 27 28
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    The thing about being rich is that they have a great many things they certainly don't need, and mortgages are among them.

    Of course, at some point along the economic scale, debt (which is bad) changes its name to leverage (which is good).

    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    U
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    U
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 3,428
    Quote
    I would love to see some studies done on this, but it is my strong suspicion that these kinds of choices are fairly common among the gifted, and the more highly gifted, the more commonly these choices. After all, the American social paradigm is money as a sign of success. And aren't the gifted paradigm breakers by nature?

    I agree with this, but maybe my friends are just very self-selected. I also went a college that is selective (top 20) but whose graduates earn relatively low salaries due to making "hippie" life choices. It's a big issue for the endowment.

    I know a LOT of highly intelligent people who have chosen not to maximize their earning potential for various reasons. My DH could make a lot more money were he to "sell out" his specialized skills, but he chooses not to because he couldn't live with himself if he did.




    Joined: Jan 2013
    Posts: 26
    M
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    M
    Joined: Jan 2013
    Posts: 26
    Leverage is one of the easiest ways to create or to deplete a great fortune. It's all a bit like gambling, isn't it?

    At some point in the wealth scale, it becomes more about safeguarding wealth for future generations and less about courting financial risks to acquire additional wealth...at least in families that have managed to retain their wealth over three generations.

    It would be interesting to see how childrearing practices and values differ in old money families as compared to new.




    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posts: 2,639
    B
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posts: 2,639
    Originally Posted by HowlerKarma
    It's just that the public doesn't figure into this anymore-- nor do employees. It's about the shareholders and the market now.
    Businesses are run to profit their owners, but they do so (by and large) by producing efficiently what people want. That is no more problematic than workers choosing jobs and consumers choosing products to maximize their own welfare. I don't see why the pursuit of self-interest by some economic actors and not others should be criticized.


    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Except that this system now has a closed feedback loop that doesn't always include end-consumers as a major input.

    That is, CEO/Board/stockholders/analysts reflect one another, and listen to one another, thereby manipulating the stock price of the company depending upon how happy the analyst(s) are based upon...

    well, often it has relatively little to do with the company's nominal profitability/consumer satisfaction/market share, or productivity within corporate divisions. It's all speculative, and not terribly long-range in terms of the company or its customer base. That forecasting is also not very accurate-- perhaps not even as good as weather predictions in a ten day forecast. wink An extra penny of profit weighed against vanishing customer satisfaction/loyalty/reliability is just an extra penny... but it really isn't, if you looked longer term, because eventually that will be lost market share.

    This actually is only recently my own opinion. I used to believe exactly what you're saying, Bostonian.

    It's something that my FIL (himself a retired banking exec who lived through the S&L meltdown) has been bemoaning (okay, okay, more like ranting...) for YEARS-- that there is a huge reality and ethics breach opening ever-further in that particular analyst centric loop that controls corporate decision-making. I confess, it wasn't until after 2008 that I began to see what he was talking about-- that companies are increasingly about pandering (really, no other word is accurate) to stock analyst whims rather than making their own decisions about what might be good for the company, its employees, and its customers. He's convinced that MBA's need to start taking ethics again, and that it may well be time for additional market regulations... probably starting with firewalling off i-banking again.


    I am not well-informed enough to know what the solution is, but I can certainly see that he's right about the feedback loop part of things. Not sure if that is the "cause" of any particular dysfunction, but it sure seems a little like a crazy way to run a capitalist market given my meager understanding of economics.



    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Originally Posted by metis
    Leverage is one of the easiest ways to create or to deplete a great fortune. It's all a bit like gambling, isn't it?

    At some point in the wealth scale, it becomes more about safeguarding wealth for future generations and less about courting financial risks to acquire additional wealth...at least in families that have managed to retain their wealth over three generations.

    It would be interesting to see how childrearing practices and values differ in old money families as compared to new.

    I think that would definitely be interesting.

    I would also be interested to see the "working" versus "non-working" financial elite's practices, there.


    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,296
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,296
    Originally Posted by HowlerKarma
    He's convinced that MBA's need to start taking ethics again, and that it may well be time for additional market regulations... probably starting with firewalling off i-banking again.

    Agreed, and would add that jail time is appropriate for a lot of these people. But not at a Club Fed facility. No, these folks need to spend time at a place with all the charm of NYC's Club Riker's.

    Last edited by Val; 05/06/13 04:01 PM. Reason: Fix iPhone autoincorrect.
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Originally Posted by HowlerKarma
    It's something that my FIL (himself a retired banking exec who lived through the S&L meltdown) has been bemoaning (okay, okay, more like ranting...) for YEARS-- that there is a huge reality and ethics breach opening ever-further in that particular analyst centric loop that controls corporate decision-making. I confess, it wasn't until after 2008 that I began to see what he was talking about-- that companies are increasingly about pandering (really, no other word is accurate) to stock analyst whims rather than making their own decisions about what might be good for the company, its employees, and its customers.

    Don't worry.

    The Fed, through it's QE program, is removing any risk of a declining stock market at the present time.

    So your investments are safe.

    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Originally Posted by Val
    [quote=HowlerKarma]Agreed, and would add that jail time is appropriate for a lot of these people. But not at a Club Fed facility. No, these folks need to spend time at a place with all the charm of NYC's Club Riker's.

    But the point of having all that success is so that you can privatize the gains and socialize the losses.

    It's the Golden Rule!

    He who has the gold makes the rules.

    Plus, you can't lose money in the stock market anymore, so it's all good.

    Capitalism is fixed, now.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Capitalism is fixed, now.

    Oh, wait-- was that a complete thought? Thought it might have been a typo and was waiting for the edit and ending to that sentence. Bated breath, even.

    wink

    ETA: just to clarify, though-- I thought that socialism was synonymous with "evil incarnate."

    I guess losses and socialism, though... lesser of two evils, right?

    Now I must think of some way to recover and go back on topic. At least plausibly so.


    Last edited by HowlerKarma; 05/06/13 04:41 PM. Reason: to add additional snark.

    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Page 26 of 28 1 2 24 25 26 27 28

    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Testing with accommodations
    by aeh - 03/27/24 01:58 PM
    Quotations that resonate with gifted people
    by indigo - 03/27/24 12:38 PM
    For those interested in astronomy, eclipses...
    by indigo - 03/23/24 06:11 PM
    California Tries to Close the Gap in Math
    by thx1138 - 03/22/24 03:43 AM
    Gifted kids in Illinois. Recommendations?
    by indigo - 03/20/24 05:41 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5