Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 167 guests, and 10 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    parentologyco, Smartlady60, petercgeelan, eterpstra, Valib90
    11,410 Registered Users
    March
    S M T W T F S
    1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    #146766 01/22/13 09:04 AM
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 2,946
    M
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 2,946
    This is a paper that discusses the results of funded study focusing on the effects of NCLB on education, suggesting that the bottom and/or middle groups have improved while the top groups have not. The top hasn't lost ground but has not been improving. They use NAEP scores- I'm not sure what those are.

    http://www.edexcellencemedia.net/pu...ldleftbehind/20080618_high_achievers.pdf


    Last edited by master of none; 01/22/13 09:14 AM.
    Joined: Jun 2012
    Posts: 393
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Jun 2012
    Posts: 393
    Thanks for sharing. This was an interesting article to read. I wonder if some of issues brought up by teachers will be looked at, ie teachers would like more training on how to teach high achievers.

    Joined: Feb 2009
    Posts: 604
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2009
    Posts: 604
    I haven't read the entire article yet, but NAEP is the national assessment of educational progress.
    My school has been selected to give this test this year, the organization has picked about 1/4 or our high school students to take this year's test in a week or so.
    That is all I know about the test, but we as a school have no say in who is tested or over the test at all.

    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 1,478
    Z
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Z
    Joined: Jul 2012
    Posts: 1,478
    Way to throw away credibility, with a survey question like this:
    " “For the public schools to help the
    U.S. live up to its ideals of justice and equality, do
    you think it’s more important that they (A) focus on
    raising the achievement of disadvantaged students
    who are struggling academically OR (B) focus equally
    on all students, regardless of their backgrounds or
    achievement levels?” Only 11 percent chose the former,
    while 86 percent chose the latter."

    Rephrased: Given that eqaulity is important... is equality important?

    Haven't read far enough to see if they address ceiling concerns (some percent of the top 10% can't go any higher.)

    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    N
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    N
    Joined: Apr 2012
    Posts: 453
    We just received a letter that our HS was selected to give this test, and that our 12th grader will be taking either the math or reading test. Not sure how they select, but the school is typically in the top 1% in the state in state standardized testing and in average SAT scores. My kid is certainly not the best student there, but if (as suggested above) they take the top 25%, I would expect her to fall in that category.

    She just groaned when she read the letter...thought all the standardized testing was over.

    Joined: Feb 2009
    Posts: 604
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2009
    Posts: 604
    When I shared this with my teacher colleagues they all said the same thing: no kidding, we could have told them this a long time ago. In other words, the results agreed with what we all see everyday and what some of us try to fight everyday.
    It was good to see the numbers though because some of the admin doesn't see that this is actually what is happening - they just see that there is still growth everywhere, the fact that it is less at the top doesn't seem to click with them. I'll let you know if I hear anything from them about this.

    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 1,390
    E
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    E
    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 1,390
    DH and I have always referred to it as No Child Gets Ahead for a reason.

    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 5,181
    A friend of mine once referred to it as "No child learns; bummer." grin



    Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar. And doesn't.
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    P
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    P
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 2,035
    I've heard a lot about nclb but not being in the US don't get to see it first hand. Is it like our new national standards;

    1/ set extremely low goals.
    2/ tell parents who are worried about their child to 'relax your child is meeting the standard'
    3/ apply the standards totally inconsistently and randomly so they don't agree with Standardised performance tests. Eg. Assess a child on one piece of writing for the whole year and declare them below standard when they test the 95th percentile in nationwide achievement tests.
    4/ have no moderation of results.
    5/release these dodgy results to the press so schools have incentives to ignore the high achieving kids.
    6/sit back and say 'aren't we doing wonderful things for equality, the bottom marks are up and the top marks down'.

    If so i think we got the idea from you.

    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 332
    B
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    B
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 332
    Up until recently, the states have set their own goals and their own content standards. Those who set lofty goals had to punish their underperforming schools with staffing changes and diversion of budgets to private corporations who would serve as restructuring consultants. Those that set easily attainable goals still had difficulty getting 100% of their students to score at grade-level proficiency.

    We still don't have national standards, but something like 80% of states have agreed to a new set of standards called The Common Core. In terms of critical thinking skills and college preparation, the Common Core standards are better. However, states don't have much money to spend on training, and there will be new tests to design on low budgets and in a rush. We can expect a bumpy transition.

    But, yes, there's nothing in NCLB about helping gifted or even proficient students to stretch and grow. All of the targets involve the same percentage of various categories of students (racial, socioeconomic, disabled, English Language Learners, etc.) scoring as grade-level Proficient in reading, math, and whatever else the state reckons it can afford to test. If one of those categories (e.g., disabled) misses the target percentage, the school has not made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

    On the other hand, if the school has less than 40 students in one of the categories, they don't have to worry about that category. I actually had a restructuring consultant ask me to try to keep the number of special needs students below 40 for that reason. Anyway, that's why it is much more difficult for middle and high schools to make AYP than it is for elementary schools. The larger schools have to qualify in more categories.


    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Testing with accommodations
    by aeh - 03/27/24 01:58 PM
    Quotations that resonate with gifted people
    by indigo - 03/27/24 12:38 PM
    For those interested in astronomy, eclipses...
    by indigo - 03/23/24 06:11 PM
    California Tries to Close the Gap in Math
    by thx1138 - 03/22/24 03:43 AM
    Gifted kids in Illinois. Recommendations?
    by indigo - 03/20/24 05:41 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5