Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    1 members (aeh), 251 guests, and 21 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    streble, DeliciousPizza, prominentdigitiz, parentologyco, Smartlady60
    11,413 Registered Users
    March
    S M T W T F S
    1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    #138735 09/21/12 12:28 PM
    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 1,390
    E
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    E
    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 1,390
    I'm lifting these out of another thread so as not to derail it.
    Originally Posted by Stacyshoe
    He does follow single-step instructions well. I've noticed that he will grab on to one word or concept if I give more complex instructions. If I say, "Go downstairs and get the book that is beside your pencil box." He might come back with the pencil box.
    Originally Posted by geofizz
    Go get a speech eval. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. By 4, he should be able to understand that slightly more complicated example and execute correctly.
    Really? Are you saying this in the context of other advanced abilities, or in general for all kids? Because my DS4 could never in a million years actually follow that instruction. He wouldn't come back with the pencil box or the book, and he'd be lucky to make it down the stairs before being distracted by something else. Is it really an age-appropriate expectation that he could do this?

    He turned 4 at the end of May. He's been reading for six months or so, and is generally able to follow one-step instructions when we're right there with him, but telling him to go somewhere else and do something, then come back, seems like a nonstarter. He also really struggles with spatial relationships - doesn't seem to know what to do with directions like "look under the couch" or "look behind the curtain." We know that he has sensory processing issues (as does DD8) - is this part of that, or should we be looking for something else?

    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 404
    M
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    M
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 404
    My dd is 9 and still has problems with complex directions, so I could totally see her doing this. She also scored low on receptive language on her eval, 16th % I think.

    Last edited by mountainmom2011; 09/21/12 12:34 PM.
    Joined: Dec 2010
    Posts: 658
    G
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    G
    Joined: Dec 2010
    Posts: 658
    There's a sequence of what's easier and harder in an instruction.

    Passive phrases are harder to understand than active ones, but for that instruction, I would have at a minimum expected a 4 year old to at least get a book from downstairs (maybe not the one that was next to the pencil case). It's a command containing two tasks (go downstairs and get the book), but with a passive phrase modifying which book. (Edit: see below, it appears this spatial sense is not yet in place for a 4 year old. Learned something new...)

    I love the PBS development tracker, because it's sufficiently detailed, and it really helps sort out normal bounds on average development, while making it clear what's out of bounds of normal development. This is the site that convinced me to get a speech eval for my then 3.5 year old son, and this is the site that later helped reassure me that DS' math development was highly unusual.

    See the second example under "Language Comprehension" here:
    http://www.pbs.org/parents/childdevelopmenttracker/four/language%20.html


    Last edited by geofizz; 09/21/12 12:54 PM.
    Joined: Dec 2010
    Posts: 658
    G
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    G
    Joined: Dec 2010
    Posts: 658
    Quote
    He turned 4 at the end of May. He's been reading for six months or so, and is generally able to follow one-step instructions when we're right there with him, but telling him to go somewhere else and do something, then come back, seems like a nonstarter.

    I'd put this more under the heading of attention, not language comprehension.

    Quote
    He also really struggles with spatial relationships - doesn't seem to know what to do with directions like "look under the couch" or "look behind the curtain." We know that he has sensory processing issues (as does DD8) - is this part of that, or should we be looking for something else?

    This comes under the math section of the PBS tracker, which would indicate your 4 year old is right on target in still developing these skills:

    http://www.pbs.org/parents/childdevelopmenttracker/four/mathematics.html
    Originally Posted by PBS site
    Throughout this year, some four-year-olds will understand and use words representing physical relations or positions (e.g., "over," "under," "above," "on," "beside," "next to," "in front," "behind," "in," "inside," "outside," "between," "up," "down," top," "bottom," "front," "back," "near," "far," "left," "right").

    They place this as a late 5 year old skill for the average child.

    Last edited by geofizz; 09/21/12 12:53 PM.
    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 1,390
    E
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    E
    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 1,390
    I bookmarked that site - it is great. It also allows me to understand (now) just how far ahead DD8 really was in math when she was this age. (I thought that observations like, "Our family has six people: two grownups, two kids, and two cats. There are three girls and three boys. Four of them are humans and two of them are cats," were standard fare.)

    Joined: Dec 2010
    Posts: 658
    G
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    G
    Joined: Dec 2010
    Posts: 658
    That site needs more air time.

    Yes, it started to dawn on me something was up with the math when I was finding the stuff that DS was figuring out as a 4 year old under the 8-9 year old section. At the same time, I found the speech/language section to be equally unfamiliar. They were discussing the grammar 3 year olds use, and single words don't count as a grammar.


    Moderated by  M-Moderator 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Testing with accommodations
    by aeh - 03/27/24 01:58 PM
    Quotations that resonate with gifted people
    by indigo - 03/27/24 12:38 PM
    New, and you'd think I'd have a clue...
    by astronomama - 03/24/24 06:01 AM
    For those interested in astronomy, eclipses...
    by indigo - 03/23/24 06:11 PM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5