Gifted Bulletin Board

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum.
CLICK HERE to Log In. Click here for the Board Rules.

Links


Learn about Davidson Academy Online - for profoundly gifted students living anywhere in the U.S. & Canada.

The Davidson Institute is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted students through the following programs:

  • Fellows Scholarship
  • Young Scholars
  • Davidson Academy
  • THINK Summer Institute

  • Subscribe to the Davidson Institute's eNews-Update Newsletter >

    Free Gifted Resources & Guides >

    Who's Online Now
    0 members (), 239 guests, and 35 robots.
    Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
    Newest Members
    streble, DeliciousPizza, prominentdigitiz, parentologyco, Smartlady60
    11,413 Registered Users
    March
    S M T W T F S
    1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    31
    Previous Thread
    Next Thread
    Print Thread
    Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 948
    D
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    D
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 948
    Originally Posted by Dude
    Originally Posted by deacongirl
    I would get the Iowa Acceleration Manual and From Emotions to Advocacy.

    I had actually planned to ask them if they'd evaluated her using the Iowa Acceleration Manual during the meeting (knowing the answer would be "No", but planting the idea of doing so), but I was ambushed when the principal dismissed the idea of acceleration out of hand.

    Meanwhile, I was sitting there listening to them filling the bingo board of misunderstandings about the nature of gifted kids:

    - "We have kids like her in every classroom."
    - "We can meet every child's individual needs through differentiation."
    - "It's important for her socially to stay with kids her own age."
    - "We know how children develop normally." (Guess what... she's not normal)

    I passed on the executive summary of "A Nation Deceived," and the principal looked at it like I'd just handed her a used tissue.

    I'll have to look at From Emotions to Advocacy, because what I'm doing right now is just the opposite. I kept my cool in the meeting, but the more I think about the result, the more angry I become.

    Def. get the book. I can already imagine the great letters you will write! I think that just starting to document things the way Wright suggests puts the school on notice that you are serious. And that if one day it does end up before a judge, the stack of letters will show how reasonable you were and how ridiculous they were. Sometimes when they realize what you are doing they suddenly become more flexible.


    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 948
    D
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    D
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 948
    Originally Posted by kickball
    To answer your question, probably not.

    Sorry.

    Depending on your state, there may be state policies requiring individual districts to maintain full grade and subject acc policies. Now - that a district chooses to do nothing with them is a different battle. But I am first curious whether - your state supports your schools belief that they do not need to evaluate for full grade acc.

    Now you write your district is implying who may have the final word - but on most such policies - there is a required appeal process. I'm horrid at the soft approach that builds for better long-term relationships but I just don't see this as over based purely on policy and how your district's board would like policy implemented to match.

    You lost a battle - get an ice pack, a shield, and suit back up.

    Today. Ice Cream. Tomorrow...

    Yes, this totally! And that book will help you do this.

    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 2,007
    Originally Posted by deacongirl
    And that if one day it does end up before a judge, the stack of letters will show how reasonable you were and how ridiculous they were. Sometimes when they realize what you are doing they suddenly become more flexible.

    Meaning you sue them?

    In that case, the most important thing is the name of the judge.

    Last edited by JonLaw; 11/09/11 10:05 AM. Reason: I'm being somewhat facetious here. When the sheer volume of evidence is large enough, the name of the judge is much less important.
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 948
    D
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    D
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 948
    Originally Posted by JonLaw
    Originally Posted by deacongirl
    And that if one day it does end up before a judge, the stack of letters will show how reasonable you were and how ridiculous they were. Sometimes when they realize what you are doing they suddenly become more flexible.

    Meaning you sue them?

    In that case, the most important thing is the name of the judge.

    Well, I am just sharing what Pete Wright has in his books and workshops--and since he argued and won a case before the Supreme Court I figure he knows what he is talking about1 And not actually sueing them--due process or something? My point is by doing what he suggests it is less likely to end up in front of a judge.

    Edited to add: just saw your edit--and yes--that is the point--the sheer volume of evidence showing the parent did everything possible to get their child an appropriate education in a reasonable way becomes hard to find against.

    Last edited by deacongirl; 11/09/11 10:52 AM.
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Posts: 2,498
    D
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    D
    Joined: Apr 2010
    Posts: 2,498
    Originally Posted by JonLaw
    Meaning you sue them?

    In most cases, if your paper trail is good enough, it doesn't make it to court. But it helps to be ready.

    Yes, all thanks to Wrightslaw!

    DeeDee

    Last edited by DeeDee; 11/09/11 10:56 AM.
    Joined: Jun 2010
    Posts: 40
    J
    Junior Member
    Offline
    Junior Member
    J
    Joined: Jun 2010
    Posts: 40
    Originally Posted by doclori
    Austin, thanks for the newspaper article. We worry so much about accelerating, it's nice to see a success story!

    Doclori, this article may help:

    http://www.davidsongifted.org/db/Articles_id_10651.aspx

    Joined: Feb 2008
    Posts: 258
    K
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    K
    Joined: Feb 2008
    Posts: 258
    A comment creates confusion... affordability and charter schools... Private schools cost money but charter schools are public, tuition free... is this not true in LA?

    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Dude Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Originally Posted by kickball
    A comment creates confusion... affordability and charter schools... Private schools cost money but charter schools are public, tuition free... is this not true in LA?

    Sorry, I misused the word. It's not a charter, it's a private.

    There are no charters in my area.

    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,296
    Val Offline
    Member
    Offline
    Member
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 3,296
    Originally Posted by Dude
    One interesting thing about the state of LA is they promise a right to a free, appropriate public education to gifted children, which goes beyond the requirements of IDEA and similar federal legislation. In concept, it's quite laudable. So now we're trying to leverage that right into what's truly appropriate for her.

    From what you've described, the people you've dealt with aren't interested in meeting you're daughter's needs. So you need a new strategy. They work in a bureaucratic system and I recommend that you use everything that system has to get what your daughter needs. My advice is to look up the law on what they have to do for gifted kids and write a letter to her school and the school board that quotes it chapter and verse.

    Include the stuff you have in writing that makes your case, like her score on the end-of-second grade test and any teacher notes or emails.

    For example, you could go after them on their failure to follow the recommendations of the testing they gave her. Where does the law stand on this point? If she passes a test (you said her reading was off the scale for end-of-second-grade), does the law mandate that they give her appropriate assignments? Or are they allowed to ignore the results and force her to do work that she has already mastered? What about an end-of-first grade math test? Call the office of gifted ed. and get answers to this and other questions. Get answers in writing or ask them to point to a relevant section of the law.

    If the district has a policy on grade skipping but the principal made a blanket statement saying he'd never even consider or allow it, use this as part of your argument that they have no intention of meeting her needs (or those of any other gifted kid for that matter). Do you have his statement in this regard in writing? If not, get it (send him an email or a real letter asking "Is there any way you might reconsider or some such thing that leaves the door open).

    Quote precisely what the law says and give specific examples of how the school if failing to meet its requirements under the law. If they said they differentiate appropriately, give examples of how their idea of appropriate differentiation isn't meeting the standard set by the law. Quote the Iowa manual and respected reports like A Nation Deceived. Etc.


    You may have to accept that in order to get what you want, you're going to have to annoy them or make them angry with you --- primarily because it sounds like they're going to have to be forced to help your daughter.

    I understand that NCLB has mandates that discourage helping gifted kids, but if the law says they have to help her, it's too bad.

    Final advice: write everything down (ask JonLaw about this). If you rely on verbal conversations, people can have different memories or interpretations of what was said.

    Last edited by Val; 11/10/11 09:56 AM. Reason: Clarity
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Dude Offline OP
    Member
    OP Offline
    Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,856
    Originally Posted by Val
    From what you've described, the people you've dealt with aren't interested in meeting you're daughter's needs.

    Actually, from everything that's gone on so far, it seems that they are interested in meeting her needs, it's just that the people in position to make decisions are completely unaware of what those needs are, and how they need to be met. The state requires a free and appropriate public education, but the contention is, what is appropriate? Hence the original question... do they even know what they're doing? All signs point to "No."

    Earlier, I pointed out a number of misconceptions about the nature of giftedness that they brought up during the meeting. If you assume that they're all true, then their strategy makes perfect sense, and is the best fit for my daughter. The problem is that none of them are true. Thus, it falls to us to provide a preponderance of evidence... and even that may not be enough, because if everyone was able to accept validated evidence that challenges their own preconceptions, there'd be no such thing as a truther or a moonie.

    Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

    Moderated by  M-Moderator, Mark D. 

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Recent Posts
    Testing with accommodations
    by aeh - 03/27/24 01:58 PM
    Quotations that resonate with gifted people
    by indigo - 03/27/24 12:38 PM
    New, and you'd think I'd have a clue...
    by astronomama - 03/24/24 06:01 AM
    For those interested in astronomy, eclipses...
    by indigo - 03/23/24 06:11 PM
    Son 2e, wide discrepancy between CogAT-Terranova
    by astronomama - 03/23/24 07:21 AM
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5