Sorry -- yes, I meant the WIAT-II, which was co-normed with the WISC-IV, I understand. Dd's WIAT scores are significantly higher than would be expected given the IQ scores the second time around. According the the GAI chart, if they were that far below her GAI, it would be considered a learning disability. Her WIAT composite scores varied from 5 to 14 pts higher (depending on the subtest) than would be predicted given the GAI. The psych didn't find that odd, but to me it would indicate that the second test may be an underestimation of her GAI, no? The reading composite score was statistically significant to a .05 significance level and the math and writing subtest differences were significant to .01.
Dd's bd is in late Sept, a few days before October, so she will be turning nine more than a month after she starts 4th grade. I, too, expected the #s to be somewhat higher using age norms as a result.
